|
s it possible to combine HiddenSavedSearch and ExtendedFieldSearch to do a replacement on a saved search $value$? I have something similar to this:
and a saved search referencing $service$, but it doesn't seem to work. |
|
You actually can. The reason why its not working is that this is one of the few cases where there's an order dependency. Put the ExtendedFieldSearch downstream from the HiddenSavedSearch. As an aside, unless the $service$ token is NOT in the initial search clause of your saved search, you really dont want to do it this way. I recommend switching from the stringreplace intention to the slightly simpler addterm intention. replace the
node that you have there, with this
This doesn't seem to be what Mick is asking for. He is trying to use the HiddenSavedSearch module to reference a search with a stringreplace variable imbedded in it.
(17 Apr '10, 00:14)
Nate ♦
Oh cheers. I edited the answer a bit.
(19 Apr '10, 19:31)
nick ♦
|
|
No, this is currently not possible. You must use a hidden search to facilitate this behavior. No, if he reverses the order and puts the HiddenSavedSearch above the ExtendedFieldSearch, it will work. It's just a little bizarre and not recommended to have $foo$ tokens in the saved search itself.
(11 May '10, 08:18)
nick ♦
|
