Refine your search:

Since the Windows Event Viewer archives and generates a new log at 20MB (its maximum capacity), is there a risk that the Windows monitor would fail to consume an event if the events are being generated at a very quick pace? In other words, the creation of windows event logs is outpacing the Splunk monitor. For example, say your Windows server is generated X kb of Windows Security Events per second, but the splunk monitor can only consume X - 1 kb events per second, by the time the log hits 20MB and is archived, the splunk monitor has failed to consume all 20MB, so in theory I am missing some events. Is this a possibility?

asked 03 Apr '12, 08:18

carmackd's gravatar image

carmackd
4883323
accept rate: 22%

Can you describe the input you've got configured? Are you writing event logs to a file, or polling via WMI?

(03 Apr '12, 09:51) jbsplunk ♦

One Answer:

This does not directly address your question, but if this does become an issue, you may be able to switch from archiving events, to 'overwrite events older than X days' and increasing the log size so it has time to pull. Although, I don't think you'll have that issue, I just don't have any proof to support it. Just a suggestion though.

link

answered 03 Apr '12, 14:06

jsb22's gravatar image

jsb22
1527
accept rate: 17%

Post your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

Log In to enable email subscriptions

RSS:

Answers

Answers + Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "Title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "Title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Tags:

×150
×145
×141

Asked: 03 Apr '12, 08:18

Seen: 733 times

Last updated: 03 Apr '12, 14:06

Copyright © 2005-2012 Splunk Inc. All rights reserved.